Pulitano
explores the Caribbean Sea and landscape seen in Danticat’s stories, and how
these should be considered a part of the Haitian culture, as they contain
colonial history relating to their suffering and background. The author presents this argument by looking
at various of Danticat’s stories, such as “The farming Bones” , “Nineteen
Thirty-Seven”, and “Children of the Sea”, and what literary experts have to say
about them.
The first story analyzed is “The
Farming of Bones”. Pulitano views how the sugar cane landscape of Haiti and the
Dominican Republic create a monument representing the history of the violent events
that occurred in that area, what Danticat calls “uncomfortable spaces”. These uncomfortable spaces emanate in the fact
that the Haitian government turned their people in to slave labor of the sugar
cane mills, in which they were abused. Through the events that occurred to the
characters in “The Farming of Bones” Suarez believes that landscape and
fictional stories serve as agents which restore the memories and stories of
communities, at the same time healing their wounds and looking for future hope.
When looking at “Children of the Sea” and “The Farming Bones” Glissant and
Brathwaite conjecture that most of the Caribbean culture’s memory is implanted
in the environment. Due to this fact Danticat’s genocide and ecocide stories
present the history representing of the Caribbean archipelago. In the story “Nineteen
Thirty-seven” Pulitano mentions that the Massacre River divides an island into
two contrasting nations, collecting memories of both Haiti and the Dominican
Republic. It is where the massacre of Haitians occurred, an encounter between
life and death, forever reminding the inhabitants of their background. Such as
the case with Amabelle in “The Faming of Bones”, she attempts to eras the river
from the landscape, as it is not visible during the night, yet the river won’t
ever disappear, and its permanent existence reminds the inhabitants of their
history. In “Children of the Sea” Pulitano suggests that the Caribbean sea
reminds the characters of the events of the middle passage.
Pulitano concludes that Danticat
doesn’t talk about Haiti to portray a sense of nationalism, yet to remind her
audience of a history that may have been hidden, providing hope to the survivors of the tragic events. I agree with what the author says, as the landscapes of
the archipelago provide a permanent memory of the events that occurred.
The way Pulitano executes this analysis relates to the literary analysis that
is to be done in class, as it analyzes the author, similar themes in the
author’s work, and contains a lot of scholarly citations.
No comments:
Post a Comment